data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfe25/bfe253adc42e864f9f5fc589027409151f2d9884" alt=""
This defamation suit was based on how the defendants reported the circumstances surrounding a guardianship. The trial court entered summary judgment in the defendants’ favor and the plaintiff appealed. The appellate court affirmed the summary judgment and sanctioned the appellant’s attorneys for the language they used in their initial and reply briefs.
Before you read the order [oops, too late!], try to figure out how the following terms were used:
Baloney
Fraud on the court
Twilight Zone Doctors
Internet freaks
Internet screwballs
Liars
Internet lynch mob
Elevating porno queens to the level of supreme court judges
Star Chamber proceeding
Poison pen letter
The court held that the arguments presented on appeal were, on their merits, frivolous, and awarded the appellees attorney’s fees for the appeal under F.S. 57.105.
By the way, just in case you are interested you can watch a video of the oral argument here.
To email me, click Perry S. Itkin.